← All cases

Anonymized field reference — engineering experience without publishable raw data

Metal heat-treat: flue-water buffer + HTHP flashes ~135°C steam

Anonymized heat-treat lines recover furnace flue heat to a ~70°C water buffer, then a high-temp heat pump produces ~140°C water for flash steam to bath heaters.

Engineering data

Case type
Anonymized field reference
Data status
anonymized_field_reference
Industry
Manufacturing
Source temperature
65–75°C
Sink temperature
135–140°C
Temperature lift
≈ 60 K
Heating or cooling duty
Not disclosed
Architecture
Flue → water buffer → HTHP → flash steam, paralleled with legacy steam
Result status
Baths held near 90°C on flash steam; network steam opens only when HP steam is short
Key risk
Flue exchanger fouling; flash-steam stability; backup valve logic
Existing system
4-bar network steam to wash / anneal / pickle / rinse baths (60–90°C)
Refrigerant
High-temperature HTHP fluid (site-specific)
COP
Illustrative value
Annual savings
Public note: legacy steam OPEX could exceed ¥3 M/y at full load before retrofit
Estimated payback
Cited in source; tariff-dependent

Project background

A metal-processing site ran four heat-treat lines whose baths needed 60–90°C holds. Network steam cost dominated OPEX, while furnace flue heat was available for recovery.

Source / inputs

Baths 60–90°C. Buffer ~70°C from flue. HP condenser water ~140°C flashing to ~135°C steam. Customer and city identifiers omitted.

Heat pump solution

Water recovers flue heat into a controlled buffer; a high-temp heat pump lifts that heat to ~140°C water; a flash vessel makes ~135°C steam tied into the steam header with a remote backup valve.

COP & savings

Source report focuses on architecture and steam displacement rather than a single COP number. Treat thermal ratings as site-design values.

Investment / ROI notes

Driven by steam tariff displacement on multi-line continuous duty; verify hours and steam price locally.